TY - JOUR
T1 - Actos de disenso como urbanismo democratizador
T2 - El espacio político en Santiago de Chile
AU - Perucich, José Francisco Vergara
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Editora CHAMPAGNAT. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - This article aims to advance in the theorization of the dissensual urbanism. The representative democracy is at the stake and people choose the street and the protest to demand changes. This phenomenon is increasing and the city has become an amplifier of people`s unrest. The use of urban spaces for contesting the democracy built upon consensus, and exposes the emergence of an urbanism that breaks the traditional approach of production of spaces, stripping these processes from the real estate market and claiming for new forms of urbanization. Based on evidence obtained by a fieldwork in Santiago de Chile, this article exposes the potentiality of a dissensual urbanism in order to democratize democracy. Given the exponential increase of the number of people marching to express their political posture, the street has stressed its function as political tool. On the other hand, the reduction of participation in traditional democratic instruments (like voting or trusting in representatives) exposes how this mode of consensual democracy is at the stake. Thus, new theories of urbanism are required for informing the imminent strengthening of dissensual urban spaces.
AB - This article aims to advance in the theorization of the dissensual urbanism. The representative democracy is at the stake and people choose the street and the protest to demand changes. This phenomenon is increasing and the city has become an amplifier of people`s unrest. The use of urban spaces for contesting the democracy built upon consensus, and exposes the emergence of an urbanism that breaks the traditional approach of production of spaces, stripping these processes from the real estate market and claiming for new forms of urbanization. Based on evidence obtained by a fieldwork in Santiago de Chile, this article exposes the potentiality of a dissensual urbanism in order to democratize democracy. Given the exponential increase of the number of people marching to express their political posture, the street has stressed its function as political tool. On the other hand, the reduction of participation in traditional democratic instruments (like voting or trusting in representatives) exposes how this mode of consensual democracy is at the stake. Thus, new theories of urbanism are required for informing the imminent strengthening of dissensual urban spaces.
KW - Democracy
KW - Dissensus
KW - Urbanism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062820255&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1590/2175-3369.011.001.AO01
DO - 10.1590/2175-3369.011.001.AO01
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85062820255
SN - 2175-3369
VL - 11
JO - Urbe
JF - Urbe
M1 - e20170195
ER -