TY - JOUR
T1 - Formulation strategies of probiotics in broilers
T2 - systematic review and meta-analysis of their effects on production performance
AU - Opazo, Rafael
AU - Salinas, Catalina
AU - Villasante, Alejandro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Opazo, Salinas and Villasante.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Introduction: The broiler chicken industry has grown rapidly, suggesting that this sector plays a key role in ensuring global food security. However, to meet future needs, how chickens are raised must be improved, as probiotics are promising feed additives. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of 338 articles retrieved from four scientific databases to evaluate the effectiveness of different probiotic formulations in broiler chickens. The analysis focused on body weight gain (BWG) and feed conversion ratio (FCR). Results: The most common probiotics were Bacillus, Lactobacillus, and a mixture of different genera types (Probiotic Mix). The results showed that these probiotic formulations had a significant positive effect on both BWG and FCR. The combined effect sizes for BWG were as follows: Lactobacillus (1.08); Probiotic Mix (0.96); and Bacillus (0.87). The effect sizes for FCR were as follows: Probiotic Mix (-1.32) Lactobacillus, (-1.22); and Bacillus (-1.04). Except for BWG in Bacillus category, there was considerable variation in the results. Researchers have also looked at factors such as probiotic dose (CFU/kg) and the number of strains in the Probiotic Mix, but these did not have a significant influence on heterogeneity. When converted combined effect sizes to metric units (g or kg), Lactobacillus showed the best results, with a 221.69 (g) increase in BWG and 0.17 (kg) decrease in FCR. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that probiotic supplementation, particularly Lactobacillus, improves growth performance and feed efficiency in broiler chickens. These findings support the inclusion of probiotics in poultry farming as a strategy to enhance production efficiency and contribute to future global food security.
AB - Introduction: The broiler chicken industry has grown rapidly, suggesting that this sector plays a key role in ensuring global food security. However, to meet future needs, how chickens are raised must be improved, as probiotics are promising feed additives. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of 338 articles retrieved from four scientific databases to evaluate the effectiveness of different probiotic formulations in broiler chickens. The analysis focused on body weight gain (BWG) and feed conversion ratio (FCR). Results: The most common probiotics were Bacillus, Lactobacillus, and a mixture of different genera types (Probiotic Mix). The results showed that these probiotic formulations had a significant positive effect on both BWG and FCR. The combined effect sizes for BWG were as follows: Lactobacillus (1.08); Probiotic Mix (0.96); and Bacillus (0.87). The effect sizes for FCR were as follows: Probiotic Mix (-1.32) Lactobacillus, (-1.22); and Bacillus (-1.04). Except for BWG in Bacillus category, there was considerable variation in the results. Researchers have also looked at factors such as probiotic dose (CFU/kg) and the number of strains in the Probiotic Mix, but these did not have a significant influence on heterogeneity. When converted combined effect sizes to metric units (g or kg), Lactobacillus showed the best results, with a 221.69 (g) increase in BWG and 0.17 (kg) decrease in FCR. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that probiotic supplementation, particularly Lactobacillus, improves growth performance and feed efficiency in broiler chickens. These findings support the inclusion of probiotics in poultry farming as a strategy to enhance production efficiency and contribute to future global food security.
KW - Bacillus
KW - body weight gain
KW - broilers
KW - feed conversion ratio
KW - Lactobacillus
KW - meta-analysis
KW - probiotics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105018822659&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fanim.2025.1679614
DO - 10.3389/fanim.2025.1679614
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:105018822659
SN - 2673-6225
VL - 6
JO - Frontiers in Animal Science
JF - Frontiers in Animal Science
M1 - 1679614
ER -