TY - JOUR
T1 - Knowledge, Attitudes, Perception and Willingness-To-Pay for Animal Welfare and Environmentally Friendly Certified Salmon Products in Chile
T2 - The Case of Bio Bio District
AU - Herrera, Bastian
AU - Ferhmann, Karen
AU - Cañon Jones, Hernan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Aquaculture is expanding rapidly to meet growing protein demands, now providing over 50% of aquatic animal food. Salmon farming is especially important in Chile due to its favorable conditions and cost advantages. However, the industry faces challenges, including environmental sustainability and public perception. This study surveyed 396 people aged 18–65 in Chile’s Bio Bio region about their knowledge and views on salmon farming and animal welfare. Results showed limited public understanding: 76% were unaware of information sources, and 52% were unsure of the industry’s national role. Many viewed the industry as nontransparent, environmentally harmful, and poorly regulated, though its economic impact led to general acceptance. Knowledge of animal welfare was low—43% reported little or none—but support for better protections was high: 97% favored stronger welfare measures and 94% wanted more information. While 92% showed interest in welfare-certified salmon, only 21% were willing to pay up to 5% more. The study underscores the importance of public education and transparency to foster support for sustainable and welfare-conscious aquaculture.
AB - Aquaculture is expanding rapidly to meet growing protein demands, now providing over 50% of aquatic animal food. Salmon farming is especially important in Chile due to its favorable conditions and cost advantages. However, the industry faces challenges, including environmental sustainability and public perception. This study surveyed 396 people aged 18–65 in Chile’s Bio Bio region about their knowledge and views on salmon farming and animal welfare. Results showed limited public understanding: 76% were unaware of information sources, and 52% were unsure of the industry’s national role. Many viewed the industry as nontransparent, environmentally harmful, and poorly regulated, though its economic impact led to general acceptance. Knowledge of animal welfare was low—43% reported little or none—but support for better protections was high: 97% favored stronger welfare measures and 94% wanted more information. While 92% showed interest in welfare-certified salmon, only 21% were willing to pay up to 5% more. The study underscores the importance of public education and transparency to foster support for sustainable and welfare-conscious aquaculture.
KW - Chile
KW - Salmon
KW - sustainability
KW - welfare
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105005496526&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10888705.2025.2507044
DO - 10.1080/10888705.2025.2507044
M3 - Article
C2 - 40376773
AN - SCOPUS:105005496526
SN - 1088-8705
JO - Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science
JF - Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science
ER -