TY - JOUR
T1 - The normalised difference vegetation index as an analytic tool for wheat crop yield prediction
T2 - A review and meta-analysis
AU - Fuentes, Ignacio
AU - Al-Shammari, Dhahi
AU - Al-Nasrawi, Ali K.M.
AU - Wang, Yan
AU - Wang, Jie
AU - Lebrini, Youssef
AU - Chen, Yang
AU - Jones, Brian G.
AU - Bishop, Thomas F.A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2025.
PY - 2025/8
Y1 - 2025/8
N2 - The normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) is widely used for crop yield prediction. Several studies have shown that there is a positive correlation between NDVI and crop yield, with higher NDVI values indicating healthier and more productive crops. However, various factors can influence the accuracy of the NDVI-crop yield relationship. A systematic review, meta-analysis, and topic modelling analysis were conducted to summarise and quantify the existing evidence of this relationship. More specifically, this review evaluated studies that used NDVI as a tool for wheat crop yield prediction and applied the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model to uncover the thematic structure of existing literature. Results show that while NDVI can serve as a standalone predictor, its generalisability and accuracy are limited by factors like observation timing and the chosen statistical approach. Notably, NDVI saturation, particularly above values of 0.75, leads to inaccurate yield estimations, highlighting the need for caution when using peak NDVI. Spatial, temporal, spectral, and radiometric uncertainties may further introduce errors that impact yield predictions. Additionally, agronomic and environmental conditions significantly influence the NDVI-yield relationship, emphasising the complexity of yield estimation models. The meta-analysis revealed substantial variation among studies due to the source of NDVI and the sampling statistic used. Therefore, relying solely on NDVI for crop yield prediction in simple linear regression models can lead to unrealistic yield estimations, especially if large scales and peak NDVI are utilised. Complementing these findings, the LDA analysis identified five key topics, with “Vegetation modelling” emerging as the dominant theme, reflecting NDVI’s central role in crop yield prediction. The co-occurrence of topics such as “Vegetation modelling” and “Water, soil, and productivity” highlights the interconnected nature of research on NDVI and its integration with studies on environmental and agricultural factors. This reinforces the need to consider multifaceted drivers influencing the NDVI-yield relationship to enhance the accuracy and applicability of crop yield predictions.
AB - The normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) is widely used for crop yield prediction. Several studies have shown that there is a positive correlation between NDVI and crop yield, with higher NDVI values indicating healthier and more productive crops. However, various factors can influence the accuracy of the NDVI-crop yield relationship. A systematic review, meta-analysis, and topic modelling analysis were conducted to summarise and quantify the existing evidence of this relationship. More specifically, this review evaluated studies that used NDVI as a tool for wheat crop yield prediction and applied the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model to uncover the thematic structure of existing literature. Results show that while NDVI can serve as a standalone predictor, its generalisability and accuracy are limited by factors like observation timing and the chosen statistical approach. Notably, NDVI saturation, particularly above values of 0.75, leads to inaccurate yield estimations, highlighting the need for caution when using peak NDVI. Spatial, temporal, spectral, and radiometric uncertainties may further introduce errors that impact yield predictions. Additionally, agronomic and environmental conditions significantly influence the NDVI-yield relationship, emphasising the complexity of yield estimation models. The meta-analysis revealed substantial variation among studies due to the source of NDVI and the sampling statistic used. Therefore, relying solely on NDVI for crop yield prediction in simple linear regression models can lead to unrealistic yield estimations, especially if large scales and peak NDVI are utilised. Complementing these findings, the LDA analysis identified five key topics, with “Vegetation modelling” emerging as the dominant theme, reflecting NDVI’s central role in crop yield prediction. The co-occurrence of topics such as “Vegetation modelling” and “Water, soil, and productivity” highlights the interconnected nature of research on NDVI and its integration with studies on environmental and agricultural factors. This reinforces the need to consider multifaceted drivers influencing the NDVI-yield relationship to enhance the accuracy and applicability of crop yield predictions.
KW - Large scale yield prediction
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Remote sensing
KW - Resolution
KW - Topic modelling
KW - Vegetation index
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105007712836&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11119-025-10247-z
DO - 10.1007/s11119-025-10247-z
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:105007712836
SN - 1385-2256
VL - 26
JO - Precision Agriculture
JF - Precision Agriculture
IS - 4
M1 - 55
ER -