Identification and Characterization of Salmonella Phages and Absence of Salmonella Strains from Three Different Study Areas of Cattle Livestock

Dácil Rivera, Kasim Allel, Carla Salazar, Christopher Hamilton-West, Fernando Dueñas, Luis Pablo Hervé, Andrea I. Moreno-Switt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Salmonella represents a significant risk to both public and animal health. Although Salmonella strains have not been isolated from cattle livestock, Salmonella phages have been successfully identified. Materials and Methods: Our study was conducted through (i) investigating the presence of Salmonella strains and Salmonella phages in three study areas, (ii) phenotypic screening by lytic profile (LP); (iii) selecting nine phages for sequencing; and (iv) genomic comparison to evaluate their relative diversity. Results: A total of 307 samples were analyzed, resulting in a total of 162 virus-like particles (VLPs) analyzed. The LP was performed to identify Salmonella strains susceptible to phage infection, including the most frequent serovars: Dublin, Enteritidis, and Javiana. From the VLPs, nine phages were selected for genomic comparison. These phages represent three morphotypes: siphoviruses, myoviruses, and podoviruses, originating from different geographic and productive sites. Conclusions: This study enhances the understanding of the presence and diversity of Salmonella phages in cattle livestock, even in the absence of Salmonella strains.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)241-252
Number of pages12
JournalPHAGE: Therapy, Applications, and Research
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • diversity Salmonella phage
  • lysis profile of Salmonella phage
  • phages from cattle
  • Salmonella phage

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Identification and Characterization of Salmonella Phages and Absence of Salmonella Strains from Three Different Study Areas of Cattle Livestock'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this