TY - JOUR
T1 - Presiones, intereses y principios
T2 - la diplomacia chilena ante la intervención de Estados Unidos en República Dominicana de 1965. Una historia desde las fuentes oficiales
AU - Harvey-Valdés, Hugo
AU - Rivas, Álvaro Sierra
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Center for International Historical Studies of University of Barcelona. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/3/18
Y1 - 2025/3/18
N2 - This article examines Chile’s posture regarding the United States intervention in the Dominican Republic in 1965 through the analysis of declassified documents from official sources in Chile and the United States. The unilateral American action challenged Latin American coherence during the Cold War, creating tensions in inter-American relations and the international system. The research highlights Chile’s determination to preserve its independence, facing American coercion even at the cost of economic assistance programs. The complexities of diplomatic tensions and internal contradictions are unveiled, including misunderstandings between the Chilean Delegation at the OAS and the Foreign Ministry. The destabilizing role of the U.S. ambassador in Chile is also explored, as he consistently misinformed Chilean authorities during the decision-making process throughout the crisis. Ultimately, Chile’s position emerges as a paradigmatic milestone in respecting the principle of non-intervention and autonomy against U.S. interests.
AB - This article examines Chile’s posture regarding the United States intervention in the Dominican Republic in 1965 through the analysis of declassified documents from official sources in Chile and the United States. The unilateral American action challenged Latin American coherence during the Cold War, creating tensions in inter-American relations and the international system. The research highlights Chile’s determination to preserve its independence, facing American coercion even at the cost of economic assistance programs. The complexities of diplomatic tensions and internal contradictions are unveiled, including misunderstandings between the Chilean Delegation at the OAS and the Foreign Ministry. The destabilizing role of the U.S. ambassador in Chile is also explored, as he consistently misinformed Chilean authorities during the decision-making process throughout the crisis. Ultimately, Chile’s position emerges as a paradigmatic milestone in respecting the principle of non-intervention and autonomy against U.S. interests.
KW - Chilean diplomacy
KW - Christian Democracy
KW - Cold War
KW - crisis in the Dominican Republic
KW - U.S. intervention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105002620263&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1344/segleXX2024.17.10
DO - 10.1344/segleXX2024.17.10
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105002620263
SN - 2339-6806
VL - 2024
SP - 211
EP - 238
JO - Segle XX
JF - Segle XX
IS - 17
ER -