Presiones, intereses y principios: la diplomacia chilena ante la intervención de Estados Unidos en República Dominicana de 1965. Una historia desde las fuentes oficiales

Translated title of the contribution: Coercion, interests and principles: Chilean diplomacy in the face of the 1965 United States intervention in the Dominican Republic. A history from official sources

Hugo Harvey-Valdés, Álvaro Sierra Rivas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article examines Chile’s posture regarding the United States intervention in the Dominican Republic in 1965 through the analysis of declassified documents from official sources in Chile and the United States. The unilateral American action challenged Latin American coherence during the Cold War, creating tensions in inter-American relations and the international system. The research highlights Chile’s determination to preserve its independence, facing American coercion even at the cost of economic assistance programs. The complexities of diplomatic tensions and internal contradictions are unveiled, including misunderstandings between the Chilean Delegation at the OAS and the Foreign Ministry. The destabilizing role of the U.S. ambassador in Chile is also explored, as he consistently misinformed Chilean authorities during the decision-making process throughout the crisis. Ultimately, Chile’s position emerges as a paradigmatic milestone in respecting the principle of non-intervention and autonomy against U.S. interests.

Translated title of the contributionCoercion, interests and principles: Chilean diplomacy in the face of the 1965 United States intervention in the Dominican Republic. A history from official sources
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)211-238
Number of pages28
JournalSegle XX
Volume2024
Issue number17
DOIs
StatePublished - 18 Mar 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Coercion, interests and principles: Chilean diplomacy in the face of the 1965 United States intervention in the Dominican Republic. A history from official sources'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this