TY - JOUR
T1 - Traversing the food-biodiversity nexus towards coexistence by manipulating social–ecological system parameters
AU - Crespin, Silvio J.
AU - Simonetti, Javier A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Conservation Letters published by Wiley Periodicals LLC
PY - 2021/5/1
Y1 - 2021/5/1
N2 - Agroecological landscapes have the potential to simultaneously meet food security and biodiversity conservation goals but are hindered by emerging biodiversity conflicts. Here, we opt to view the social–ecological factors that decrease biodiversity impacts or increase tolerance of biodiversity in agroecological landscapes as system parameters for their potential capacity to move a social–ecological system from states of conflict to alternative desired system states devoid of major losses for both food security and biodiversity, that is landscapes of coexistence. We discuss how reframing landscapes as social–ecological systems allows focusing on manageable components, or coexistence parameters, that explain biodiversity impacts and are hence capable of dampening conflicts. Approaches from the social, economic, or ecological sciences allow for the formulation of management strategies tailor-made for each system, with a higher chance of success than one-size-fits-all strategies. Conceptually recognizing coexistence parameters may enable easier assessment of a landscape's current state and identification of the required actions needed to transition towards a state of coexistence.
AB - Agroecological landscapes have the potential to simultaneously meet food security and biodiversity conservation goals but are hindered by emerging biodiversity conflicts. Here, we opt to view the social–ecological factors that decrease biodiversity impacts or increase tolerance of biodiversity in agroecological landscapes as system parameters for their potential capacity to move a social–ecological system from states of conflict to alternative desired system states devoid of major losses for both food security and biodiversity, that is landscapes of coexistence. We discuss how reframing landscapes as social–ecological systems allows focusing on manageable components, or coexistence parameters, that explain biodiversity impacts and are hence capable of dampening conflicts. Approaches from the social, economic, or ecological sciences allow for the formulation of management strategies tailor-made for each system, with a higher chance of success than one-size-fits-all strategies. Conceptually recognizing coexistence parameters may enable easier assessment of a landscape's current state and identification of the required actions needed to transition towards a state of coexistence.
KW - conflict reconciliation
KW - conflict resolution
KW - human dominated landscapes
KW - human–nature coexistence
KW - human–wildlife conflict
KW - land-sharing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096712531&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/conl.12779
DO - 10.1111/conl.12779
M3 - Letter
AN - SCOPUS:85096712531
SN - 1755-263X
VL - 14
JO - Conservation Letters
JF - Conservation Letters
IS - 3
M1 - e12779
ER -